Pharma News

What’s pharma doing wrong to improve trial diversity? Everything

When Ricki Fairley pictures the perfect clinical trial site, she imagines “a beautiful Victorian house on a street in a Black neighborhood” with a wrought iron gate in the front, nudged open just a few inches. On the front porch, a Black grandmotherly figure welcomes patients with a hug, takes their children to a playroom and feeds them spaghetti. She then takes the patient to a treatment room with a comfortable chair, a hand-crocheted blanket and a cup of tea with fresh mint from the garden out back. The soul tunes of Luther Vandross play softly in the background, as Black physicians move in and out of the room.

In her “ideal world,” Fairley would build such a house “in every Black neighborhood in the top 10 cities” across the U.S. to increase clinical trial enrollment among the Black community.

Ricki Fairley, CEO, Touch, The Black Breast Cancer Alliance

Permission granted by Ricki Fairley

 

While she has yet to realize that vision, as the CEO and founder of Touch, The Black Breast Cancer Alliance, an advocacy organization aimed at decreasing the breast cancer mortality rate for Black women, is working to improve the dismal, yet all-too-familiar trial participation statistics. And as a survivor herself, Fairley is particularly focused on helping Black women.

The Black participation rate has declined consistently over the last decade — falling almost 3% just between 2020 and 2021, a report from the IQVIA Institute for Human Data Science found. And those numbers have real health-outcome consequences.

In breast cancer, for instance, Black women make up less than 3% of clinical trials and have a 71% higher risk of death and 39% higher recurrence rate of breast cancer than their white counterparts. The dearth of data on how the disease and its treatments impact Black patients accounts for some of the discrepancy in outcomes, Fairley argues.

“When you look back in history, there were no Black women in the clinical trials for the drugs that we have as standards of care. For Cytoxan, Adriamycin, Taxol, Taxotere, Herceptin — there were no Black women,” Fairley said. “They’re not working to the extent that they should. We need drugs that have been tested on our bodies.”

Still, even with recent FDA guidance that makes diversity a “must have” in clinical trials, pharmas are failing to enroll representative demographics and Fairley doesn’t see anything changing unless the industry completely reimagines its recruitment tactics.

“Pharma hasn’t known what to do yet.” she said. “It’s hard to get everybody into trials, but they can’t get Black women because they’re not talking to them the right way.”

What exactly needs to change? Well, according to Fairley, everything.

Fear of the unknown

For starters, the industry needs to begin breaking down the emotional barriers to trial enrollment, she said. While companies are beginning to tackle physical barriers — like location and transportation —these efforts aren’t likely to bear fruit if patients are still weary of science and the medical industry. And chief among the emotional barriers for the Black women she works with is a fear of the unknown.

“They don’t understand how the science works. They say ‘I’m gonna get the sugar pill and die.’ And so they’re afraid of being a guinea pig,” Fairley said, noting that much of the time “their only reference point is Henrietta Lacks, or the Syphilis study.”

But quelling these concerns is a matter of explaining the science and impact of trials in everyday terms. When Fairley speaks with patients on a personal level and explains that everything from a dog’s heart medication to Advil to cancer medications were once tested in clinical trials, they begin to get it. Then, when she tells them that they’re going to get a medication — whether it’s the standard of care or new drug candidate — they’re even more on board.


“My question in these campaigns is ‘What’s Black about it?’ You’ve got to show that you really care about the audience and are willing to invest in it.”

Ricki Fairley

CEO, Touch, The Black Breast Cancer Alliance


Of course, the other major piece of the puzzle is who is relaying the message. Familiar faces, like the Black grandmotherly figure at the door in Fairley’s dream world, are integral.

“They don’t trust doctors; they don’t trust researchers. They trust other ‘breasties,’” Fairley said of the patients she works with. “Right now, they’re going to Dr. Google and they’re seeing pronouns like ‘you’ and ‘they.’ When they come to our site, the pronouns are ‘we’ and ‘us.’”

The small difference in language lets the patients know that they’re rather part of a broader movement. Touch extends that message by exclusively featuring Black breast cancer survivors in the informational videos on its site so that patients are hearing the message from people who not only look like them but have been in their shoes.

Source link
#Whats #pharma #wrong #improve #trial #diversity

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *